REVISION RATE AFTER ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER IMPLANTATION FOR INCONTINENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: ACTUARIAL ANALYSIS
- 1 October 2001
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 166 (4) , 1372-1375
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65772-2
Abstract
We determined the actuarial revision rate for artificial urinary sphincters implanted in patients who were incontinent after radical prostatectomy. We reviewed the records of 70 consecutive patients who were incontinent after radical prostatectomy and who underwent primary artificial urinary sphincter implantation at the University of Michigan between 1984 and 1999. Questionnaires were mailed to all patients with an indwelling device, and telephone calls were placed to those who did not respond to the mailing. Information about surgical revision and current continence status was obtained from chart review and questionnaire response. The Kaplan-Meier curves for actuarial freedom from operative revision were constructed. Of the 66 patients with available postoperative data 24 (36%) required reoperation at a mean followup of 41 months. The 5-year actuarial rate for freedom from any operative revision was 50%, and the corresponding rate for cuff revision was 60%. A single operative revision did not predispose the patient to further revision. Questionnaire data indicated a continence rate of 80% (range 0 to 2 pads). Approximately half of the patients who were incontinent after radical prostatectomy may expect to undergo operative revision within 5 years after artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Despite this high reoperation rate, an excellent level of continence is maintained.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Artificial urethral sphincter for incontinenceUrology, 2000
- Artificial sphincter insertion after radiotherapy: is it worthwhile?BJU International, 2000
- MAYO CLINIC LONG-TERM ANALYSIS OF THE FUNCTIONAL DURABILITY OF THE AMS 800 ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER: A REVIEW OF 323 CASESJournal of Urology, 1998
- The fate of the ‘modern’ artificial urinary sphincter with a follow‐up of more than 10 yearsBritish Journal of Urology, 1997
- Post-Prostatectomy incontinence and the Artificial Urinary Sphincter: A Long-Term Study of Patient Satisfaction and Criteria for SuccessJournal of Urology, 1996
- Artificial urinary sphincter for post‐prostatectomy incontinenceBritish Journal of Urology, 1996
- Artificial Urinary Sphincter in Patients Following Major Pelvic Surgery and/or Radiotherapy: Are They Less Favorable Candidates?Journal of Urology, 1995
- The Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AS 800): Experience in 166 Consecutive PatientsJournal of Urology, 1992
- Mayo Clinic Experience with use of the AMS800 Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Urinary Incontinence Following Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 1989
- Management of Urinary Incontinence after Prostatectomy with the Artificial Urinary SphincterJournal of Urology, 1989