Common Pitfalls in the Conduct of Clinical Research
- 1 December 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Medical Principles and Practice
- Vol. 15 (1) , 1-8
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000089379
Abstract
Recently, paradigm shift from expert opinion towards evidence-based medicine has occurred encouraging physicians to base their treatment decisions on the best available research evidence. In the hierarchy of evidence randomized clinical trials (level 1 evidence) are considered of the highest quality (least biased) while non-randomized studies represent lower levels (levels 2-4). Several pitfalls in the design and conduct of clinical research include: lack of randomization, lack of concealment, lack of blinding, and errors in hypothesis testing (type I and II errors). A basic understanding of these principles of research will empower both investigators and readers when applying the results of research to clinical practice.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Risk of False-Positive Results in Orthopaedic Surgical TrialsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2003
- THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2002
- Type-II Error Rates (Beta Errors) of Randomized Trials in Orthopaedic TraumaJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2001
- Type II (β) errors in the hand literature: The importance of powerThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 1998
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Statistics in the Journal of Bone and Joint SurgeryJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1992
- Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- Sample Size and Power in Psychiatric Research*The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 1990
- Multiple Testing of Hypotheses in Comparing Two GroupsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1984