Early failures of total hip replacement: Effect of surgeon volume
Open Access
- 5 April 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Vol. 50 (4) , 1338-1343
- https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20148
Abstract
Objective To determine whether provider volume is associated with early failures following total hip replacement (THR) requiring revision. Methods Claims data were analyzed to follow a cohort of 57,488 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent elective primary THR in 1995–1996 in 3,044 hospitals in the US. Patients were followed through the end of 1999. Failure of primary THR was defined as a subsequent revision THR, as determined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes in hospital claims. Hospitals were stratified into 4 volume groups: low (100 THRs/year). Low‐volume surgeons were defined as those surgeons performing <12 elective primary THRs annually in the Medicare population. Associations between the rates of revision and surgeon volume were determined by hazard ratios from a proportional hazard model, with adjustment for hospital volume, patient age, poverty status, sex, and comorbidities. We also examined whether the effect of surgeon volume on revision rates differed between the first 18 months postoperatively and later time periods. Results Among 57,488 patients who had elective primary THR in 1995–1996, 2,537 (4.4%) had at least 1 revision THR by the end of 1999, with 1,437 (56.6%) of these revisions occurring within the first 18 months after the index primary THR. Median followup time was 47 months (range 0–54). Patients of high‐volume surgeons were less likely to have revision THRs than patients of low‐volume surgeons, regardless of hospital volume stratum. Further analysis revealed that the effect of surgeon volume on revisions was striking in the first 18 months after surgery but was not evident in the subsequent years. Conclusion Patients of low‐volume surgeons have higher rates of revision THR than patients of high‐volume surgeons, particularly within the first 18 months postoperatively. Referring clinicians should consider including surgeon volume among the factors influencing their choice of surgeon for elective THR.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Association of hospital and surgeon volume of total hip replacement with functional status and satisfaction three years following surgeryArthritis & Rheumatism, 2003
- Long-Term Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Cemented Custom-Designed Swan-Neck Femoral Component for Congenital Dislocation or Severe DysplasiaJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2002
- Association Between Hospital and Surgeon Procedure Volume and Outcomes of Total Hip Replacement in the United States Medicare Population*Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2001
- Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part II. Disease-specific follow-up and the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty RegisterActa Orthopaedica, 2001
- The effect of hospital-type and operating volume on the survival of hip replacements: A review of 39,505 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 1988-1996Acta Orthopaedica, 1999
- Five-Year clinical and radiographic follow-up of the uncemented long-term stable fixation total hip arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1998
- Relationship between the Volume of Total Hip Replacements Performed by Providers and the Rates of Postoperative Complications in the State of Washington*Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1997
- Relationship between mortality rates and hospital patient volume for medicare patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery of the hip, knee, spine, and femurThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1997
- Long-term results of Charnley total hip replacement. Review of 92 patients at 15 to 20 yearsThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1994
- Presentation adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: Differing perspectivesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993