Perceived Ambiguity About Cancer Prevention Recommendations: Relationship to Perceptions of Cancer Preventability, Risk, and Worry
- 1 February 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Health Communication
- Vol. 11 (sup001) , 51-69
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730600637541
Abstract
In this study, we apply the concept of “ambiguity,” as developed in the decision theory literature, to an analysis of potential psychological consequences of uncertainty about cancer prevention recommendations. We used Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2003 data to examine how perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations relates to three other cognitive variables known to influence cancer-protective behavior: perceived cancer preventability, perceived cancer risk, and cancer-related worry. Using logistic regression analyses, we tested several predictions derived from a review of literature on the effects of ambiguity perceptions on decision making, cognitions, and emotions. We found perceived ambiguity to have a strong negative relationship with perceived cancer preventability, consistent with “ambiguity aversion”—a pessimistic bias in the interpretation of ambiguity. Cancer worry moderated this relationship; ambiguity aversion increased with higher levels of worry. At the same time, perceived ambiguity was positively related to both perceived cancer risk and cancer worry. Furthermore, perceived risk partially mediated the relationship between perceived ambiguity and worry. These findings suggest that perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations may have broad and important effects on other health cognitions. We discuss ethical implications of these findings for health communication efforts, and propose a tentative causal model to guide future research.Keywords
This publication has 86 references indexed in Scilit:
- The mammography screening controversy: who and what is heard in the press?Patient Education and Counseling, 2003
- Beliefs and expectations of women under 50 years old regarding screening mammographyJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2003
- Information about screening – is it to achieve high uptake or to ensure informed choice?Health Expectations, 2001
- Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)Social Science & Medicine, 1997
- The role of mood and message ambiguity in the interplay of heuristic and systematic processingEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1994
- Anxiety and the interpretation of ambiguity: A text comprehension study.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1993
- Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidanceOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1986
- Decision Making Under AmbiguityThe Journal of Business, 1986
- The center and range of the probability interval as factors affecting ambiguity preferencesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985
- Characterization of ambiguity in decision makingBehavioral Science, 1976