The impact of therapeutic modality on outcomes following repair of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: an administrative data analysis
- 1 October 2010
- journal article
- Published by Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG) in Journal of Neurosurgery
- Vol. 113 (4) , 795-801
- https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.9.jns081645
Abstract
Enrolling a selected sample of ruptured intracranial aneurysms, the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) found endovascular coiling to be superior to microsurgical clipping. The performance of coiling in a more general population of ruptured aneurysms has not been adequately studied. Using provincial administrative data from Ontario, the authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) who underwent aneurysm repair. The exposure was defined as endovascular versus surgical aneurysm repair. The prespecified primary outcome was time to death or readmission for SAH. Data from the entire cohort were analyzed using a multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity scores were used to compare a matched subgroup of patients with aneurysms who had similar baseline characteristics. The potential impact of unmeasured confounding was assessed using sensitivity analysis. Between 1995 and 2004, 2342 aneurysms were clipped and 778 were coiled in Ontario. The proportion of aneurysms treated by coiling increased steadily over time. In the adjusted analysis of the entire cohort, endovascular coiling was associated with a significantly increased hazard of death or SAH readmission (hazard ratio 1.25 [95% CI 1.00–1.55], p = 0.04). Similar results were obtained from the propensity score matched analysis (hazard ratio 1.25 [95% CI 1.04–1.50], p = 0.02). Measures of procedural morbidity and mortality were not significantly different between groups. The results of the current analysis call into question the generalizability of the ISAT to all ruptured aneurysms. Given the limitations inherent in this form of analysis, further clinical studies—rigorously assessing the performance of endovascular therapy in patients with non-ISAT-like aneurysms—are indicated.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-upThe Lancet Neurology, 2009
- Could late rebleeding overturn the superiority of cranial aneurysm coil embolization over clip ligation seen in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial?Journal of Neurosurgery, 2008
- Predictors of Rehemorrhage After Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial AneurysmsStroke, 2008
- Rates of Delayed Rebleeding From Intracranial Aneurysms Are Low After Surgical and Endovascular TreatmentStroke, 2006
- International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusionThe Lancet, 2005
- Lessons to be learnt from the international subarachnoid haemorrhage trial (ISAT)British Journal Of Neurosurgery, 2003
- A Comparison of Statistical Modeling Strategies for Analyzing Length of Stay after CABG SurgeryHealth Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2002
- Endovascular and surgical treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: Comparison of risksAnnals of Neurology, 2000
- Accuracy of administrative data for assessing outcomes after knee replacement surgeryJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1997
- The Robust Inference for the Cox Proportional Hazards ModelJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1989