Meta‐analysis for trend estimation
- 18 December 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 23 (1) , 3-19
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1595
Abstract
Grouped dose measures, heterogeneity and publication bias are three major problems for meta‐analysis in trend estimation. In this paper, we propose a model that allows for arbitrarily aggregated dose levels, and show that the resulting estimates and standard errors can be quite different from those given by the usual assigned value method. Based on fitting a model to the funnel plot, we discuss a method for random‐effects sensitivity analysis that deals with the problems of heterogeneity and publication bias. A meta‐analysis of epidemiological studies on the effect of alcohol on the risk of breast cancer is used to illustrate the method. Our analysis suggests that the rate of increase in risk with alcohol consumption is substantially less than has been previously suggested. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- A sensitivity analysis for publication bias in systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 2001
- Meta-analysis, funnel plots and sensitivity analysisBiostatistics, 2000
- Latent Variable Models with Mixed Continuous and Polytomous DataJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 2000
- Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methodsStatistics in Medicine, 1999
- What Works?: Selectivity Models and Meta-AnalysisJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1999
- Alcoholic beverage consumption in relation to risk of breast cancer: meta-analysis and reviewCancer Causes & Control, 1994
- Methods for Trend Estimation from Summarized Dose-Response Data, with Applications to Meta-AnalysisAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1992
- A Meta-analysis of Alcohol Consumption in Relation to Risk of Breast CancerJAMA, 1988
- Alcohol consumption and risk op breast cancerInternational Journal of Cancer, 1988