When Do Research Consortia Work Well and Why? Evidence from Japanese Panel Data
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 February 2002
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 92 (1) , 143-159
- https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802760015649
Abstract
We examine the impact of a large number of Japanese government-sponsored research consortia on the research productivity of participating firms by measuring their patenting in the targeted technologies before, during, and after participation. Consistent with the predictions of the theoretical literature on research consortia, we find consortium outcomes are positively associated with the level of potential R&D spillovers within the consortium and (weakly) negatively associated with the degree of product market competition among consortium members. Furthermore, our evidence suggests that consortia are most effective when they focus on basic research.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meet me halfway: research joint ventures and absorptive capacityInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 2000
- Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? Microeconometric evaluation studiesResearch Policy, 2000
- Endogenous Spillovers and the Performance of Research Joint VenturesJournal of Industrial Economics, 1998
- Japanese Research Consortia: A Microeconometric Analysis of Industrial PolicyJournal of Industrial Economics, 1998
- High-tech R&D subsidies Estimating the effects of SematechJournal of International Economics, 1996
- Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & DThe Economic Journal, 1989
- Cost-Reducing and Demand-Creating R&D with SpilloversThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1988
- Random group effects and the precision of regression estimatesJournal of Econometrics, 1986
- An Analysis of Cooperative Research and DevelopmentThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1986
- Cost Reduction, Competition, and Industry PerformanceEconometrica, 1984