Cost-Benefit Comparison of Aerosol Bronchodilator Delivery Methods in Hospitalized Patients
- 1 April 1987
- Vol. 91 (4) , 614-618
- https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.91.4.614
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- BRONCHODILATOR RESPONSE IN CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE1986
- Prognosis in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease1–3American Review of Respiratory Disease, 1986
- Aerosol Deposition Considerations in Inhalation TherapyChest, 1985
- Spacer Devices Used with Metered-Dose InhalersChest, 1985
- THE USE OF CRITERIA FOR REVERSIBILITY AND OBSTRUCTION TO DEFINE PATIENT GROUPS FOR BRONCHODILATOR TRIALS - INFLUENCE OF CLINICAL-DIAGNOSIS, SPIROMETRIC, AND ANTHROPOMETRIC VARIABLESPublished by Elsevier ,1985
- Comparison of Metered-Dose Inhaler Attached to an Aerochamber with an Updraft Nebulizer for the Administration of Metaproterenol in Hospitalized PatientsJournal of Asthma, 1985
- Terbutaline Aerosol from a Metered Dose Inhaler with a 750-ml Spacer or as a Nebulized SolutionRespiration, 1983
- Salbutamol Inhalation in Chronic Asthma Bronchiale: Dose Aerosol vs Jet NebulizerChest, 1981
- Comparative efficacy of salbutamol by pressurized aerosol and wet nebulizer in acute asthma.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1980
- Bronchial Response to Oral Versus Aerosol Metaproterenol in AsthmaAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1980