The Regulation of Hazards and Hazardous Behaviors

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Risks to individuals engaged in "high risk" behaviors may be present because of the individual's own actions, as in the case of smoking. Alter natively, the risks may be present either because of factors in the envi ronment such as carcinogens, or because of the causal actions ofothers, such as pollution by industries. Traditionally, justifications for policies that would control hazards and restrict hazardous behaviors have been based on paternalistic principles or on a theory of social justice. Argu ments for both are criticized and rejected in favor of a third alternative rooted in utilitarian moral theory. It is argued that: (I) paternalism leads to unacceptable consequences because it would allow too much limita tion of individual liberty by policy makers; (2) justice-based arguments are too abstract for public policy problems and often rest on questiona ble empirical assumptions; and (3) utilitarian suggestions about the use of cost-benefit analysis for the resolution of these health policy prob lems are more promising than available alternatives, because they pro vide a solid moral basis for allocating scarce resources and for controlling hazardous behaviors.

This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit: