Comparison of cilostazol versus ticlopidine therapy after stent implantation
- 1 September 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 84 (5) , 511-514
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00368-9
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Development of Interventional CardiologyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- A randomized trial of aspirin versus cilostazol therapy after successful coronary stent implantationClinical Therapeutics, 1997
- Use of Cilostazol, a Novel Antiplatelet Agent, in a Post-Palmaz-Schatz Stenting RegimenThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1997
- Comparison of aspirin alone versus aspirin plus ticlopidine after coronary artery stentingThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- A Randomized Comparison of Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy after the Placement of Coronary-Artery StentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Anticoagulation after intracoronary stent insertion.Heart, 1994
- A Comparison of Balloon-Expandable-Stent Implantation with Balloon Angioplasty in Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- A Randomized Comparison of Coronary-Stent Placement and Balloon Angioplasty in the Treatment of Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- A Randomized Trial Comparing Ticlopidine Hydrochloride with Aspirin for the Prevention of Stroke in High-Risk PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Effects of Cilostazol, a Selective cAMP Phosphodiesterase Inhibitor on the Contraction of Vascular Smooth MusclePharmacology, 1988