Litter dynamics in two Sierran mixed conifer forests. I. Litterfall and decomposition rates
- 1 September 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Canadian Journal of Forest Research
- Vol. 18 (9) , 1127-1135
- https://doi.org/10.1139/x88-174
Abstract
Litterfall and decomposition rates. Can. J. For. Res. 18: 1127-1135. Litterfall was measured for 4 years and leaf litter decomposition rates were studied for 3.6 years in two mixed conifer forests (giant sequoia - fir and fir-pine) in the southern Sierra Nevada of California. The giant sequoia - fir forest (GS site) was dominated by giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum (Lindl.)Buchh.), white fir (Abies concolor Lindl. and Gord.), and sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana Dougl.). The fir-pine forest (FP site) was dominated by white fir, sugar pine, and incense cedar (Calocedrus decurrens (Torr.) Florin). Litterfall, including large woody debris < 15.2 cm in diameter, at the GS site averaged 6364 kg .cntdot. ha-1 .cntdot. year-1 compared with 4355 kg .cntdot. ha-1 .cntdot. year-1 at the FP site. Compared with other temperate coniferous forests, annual variability in litterfall (as computed by the ratio of the annual maximum/minimum litterfall) was extremely high for the GS site (5.8:1) and moderately high for the FP site (3.4:1). In the GS site, leaf litter decomposition after 3.6 years was slowest for giant sequoia (28.2% mass loss), followed by sugar pine (34.3%) and white fir (45.1%). In the FP site, mass loss was slowest for sugar pine (40.0%), followed by white fir (45.1%), while incense cedar showed the greatest mass loss (56.9%) after 3.6 years. High litterfall rates of large woody debris (i.e., 2.5-15.2 cm diameter) and slow rates of leaf litter decomposition in the giant sequoia - fir forest type may result in higher litter accumulation rates than in the fir-pine type. Leaf litter times to 95% decay for the GS and FP sites were 30 and 27 years, respectively, if the initial 0.7-year period (a short period of rapid mass decay) was ignored in the calculation. A mass balance approach for total litterfall (< 15.2 cm diameter) decomposition yielded lower decay constants than did the litterbag study and therefore longer times to 95% decay (57 years of the GS site and 62 years for the FP site).This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Litter Decay and Leaching from the Forest Floor in Pinus Contorta (Lodgepole Pine) EcosystemsJournal of Ecology, 1986
- Decomposition and accumulation of litter after fire in sub‐alpine eucalypt forestsAustralian Journal of Ecology, 1986
- Decomposition of needle litter and its organic chemical components: theory and field experiments. Long-term decomposition in a Scots pine forest. IIICanadian Journal of Botany, 1984
- Long-term decomposition and nutrient dynamics in Pacific silver fir needles in western WashingtonCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 1984
- Productivity and nutrient cycling in taiga forest ecosystemsCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 1983
- Organic Matter and Nutrient Dynamics in Forest Floors of Young and Mature Abies amabilis Stands in Western Washington, as Affected by Fine‐Root InputEcological Monographs, 1983
- Litter decomposition and nutrient release in Douglas-fir, red alder, western hemlock, and Pacific silver fir ecosystems in western WashingtonCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 1980
- Steady State and the Continuous Input Model of Litter Accumulation and Decompostion in Australian Eucalypt ForestsEcology, 1980
- Effect of habitat and substrate quality on Douglas fir litter decomposition in western OregonCanadian Journal of Botany, 1977
- Energy Storage and the Balance of Producers and Decomposers in Ecological SystemsEcology, 1963