On the Determination of Appropriate Dimensionality in Data with Error
- 1 March 1974
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Psychometrika
- Vol. 39 (1) , 91-109
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02291579
Abstract
The study deals with the problem of determining true dimensionality of data-with-error scaled by Kruskal's multidimensional scaling technique. Artificial data was constructed for 6, 8, 12, 16, and 30 point configurations of 1, 2, or 3 true dimensions by adding varying amounts of error to the true distances. Results show how stress is affected by error, number of points, and number of dimensions, and indicate that stress and the “elbow” criterion are inadequate for purposes of identifying true dimensionality when there is error in the data. The Wagenaar-Padmos procedure for identifying true dimensionality and error level is discussed. A simplified technique, involving a measure called Constraint, is suggested.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- QUANTITATIVE INTERPRETATION OF STRESS IN KRUSKAL'S MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING TECHNIQUEBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1971
- Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling: Recovery of Metric InformationPsychometrika, 1970
- A Monte Carlo Investigation of the Statistical Significance of Kruskal's Nonmetric Scaling ProcedurePsychometrika, 1969
- Some Statistical Considerations in Multidimensional ScalingPsychometrika, 1969
- Goodness of fit for random rankings in Kruskal's nonmetric scaling procedure.Psychological Bulletin, 1969
- Foundations of multidimensional scaling.Psychological Review, 1968
- Metric structures in ordinal dataJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1966
- Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling: A Numerical MethodPsychometrika, 1964
- Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesisPsychometrika, 1964
- On a Connection Between Factor Analysis and Multidimensional UnfoldingPsychometrika, 1960