Effects of left ventricular unloading by Impella recover LP2.5 on coronary hemodynamics
- 26 September 2007
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 70 (4) , 532-537
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.21160
Abstract
Objectives: We studied the effects of LV unloading by the Impella on coronary hemodynamics by simultaneously measuring intracoronary pressure and flow and the derived parameters fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), and coronary microvascular resistance (MR). Background: Patients with compromised left ventricular (LV) function undergoing high‐risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may benefit from LV unloading. Limited information is available on the effects of LV unloading on coronary hemodynamics. Methods: Eleven patients (mean LV ejection fraction of 35 ± 11%) underwent PCI during LV support by the LV unloading device (Impella Recover® LP2.5). Intracoronary measurements were performed in a nonstenotic coronary artery after the PCI, before and after adenosine‐induced hyperemia at four different support levels (0–2.5 L/min). Results: Aortic and coronary pressure increased with increasing support levels, whereas FFR remained unchanged. Baseline flow velocity remained unchanged, while hyperemic flow velocity and CFVR increased significantly with increasing support levels (61 ± 24 to 72 ± 27 cm/sec, P = 0.001 and 1.88 ± 0.52 to 2.34 ± 0.63, P < 0.001 respectively). The difference between baseline MR and hyperemic MR significantly increased with increasing support levels (1.28 ± 1.32 to 1.89 ± 1.43 mm Hg cm−1 sec, P = 0.005). Conclusions: Unloading of the LV by the Impella increased aortic and intracoronary pressure, hyperemic flow velocity and CFVR, and decreased MR. The Impella‐induced increase in coronary flow, probably results from both an increased perfusion pressure and a decreased LV volume‐related intramyocardial resistance.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Time Course of Microvascular Resistance of the Infarct and Noninfarct Coronary Artery Following an Anterior Wall Acute Myocardial InfarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2006
- Safety and Feasibility of Elective High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Procedures With Left Ventricular Support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5The American Journal of Cardiology, 2006
- Physiological Basis of Clinically Used Coronary Hemodynamic IndicesCirculation, 2006
- Elective versus provisional intra-aortic balloon pumping in high-risk percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplastyAmerican Heart Journal, 2003
- Left ventricular support by Catheter-Mountedaxial flow pump reduces infarct sizeJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2003
- Hyperemic Stenosis Resistance Index for Evaluation of Functional Coronary Lesion SeverityCirculation, 2002
- Relation of Hemodynamic Variables to Augmentation of Left Anterior Descending Coronary Flow by Intraaortic Balloon Pulsation in Coronary Artery DiseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1997
- The effect of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation on regional myocardial blood flow and oxygen consumption in the presence of coronary artery stenosis in patients with unstable angina.Circulation, 1982
- Effects of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation on regional coronary blood flow in experimental myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1974
- Assisted circulation. III. The effect of synchronized arterial counterpulsation on myocardial oxygen consumption and coronary flowAmerican Heart Journal, 1962