It’s More Than a Black Box; It’s a Russian Doll
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
- Vol. 82 (8) , 639-652
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000078200.61840.2d
Abstract
Whyte J, Hart T: It’s more than a black box; it’s a Russian doll: Defining rehabilitation treatments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:639–652. Research on treatment efficacy and effectiveness requires that the treatments of interest be objectively defined. Such definitions are relatively straightforward for pharmacologic and surgical treatments, in which the active ingredients can be specified in terms of chemical structure or anatomic result. Definitions of treatment are more difficult for the many experience-based interventions employed in rehabilitation. This has led to the criticism that much clinical rehabilitation research has characterized the treatments of interest as a “black box,” allowing little insight into the active ingredients contained therein. Moreover, rehabilitation care may involve the simultaneous application of multiple different treatments, raising the question of whether to define the individual components or the service delivery system. In this article, we consider how the levels of analysis considered in rehabilitation (disease, impairment, activity, and participation) and the role of theory shape the definition of treatment, and we address the need to develop protocol-based treatments and tools to objectively verify their contents. Rigorous definition of rehabilitation treatments, supported by theory, will facilitate needed efficacy research, will allow replication of that research, and will ultimately foster dissemination of effective treatments into clinical practice.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nurse-Staffing Levels and the Quality of Care in HospitalsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Community based rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trialJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2002
- Quality of Intervention Research Reporting in Medical Rehabilitation JournalsAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 2002
- Defining the Population, Treatments, and Outcomes of InterestAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 2001
- Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trialPublished by Elsevier ,1999
- Toward a more clinically valid approach to therapy research.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1998
- Treatment strength in rehabilitationArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1997
- Outcomes and costs after hip fracture and stroke. A comparison of rehabilitation settingsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- Toward A Methodology For Rehabilitation ResearchAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 1994
- The treatment of acquired aphasiaPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1994