Getting out alive: how predators affect the decision to metamorphose
Top Cited Papers
- 14 March 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Oecologia
- Vol. 152 (3) , 389-400
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0675-5
Abstract
Metamorphosis has intrigued biologists for a long time as an extreme form of complex life cycles that are ubiquitous in animals. While investigated from a variety of perspectives, the ecological focus has been on identifying and understanding the ecological factors that affect an individual’s decision on when, and at what size, to metamorphose. Predation is a major factor that affects metamorphic decisions and a recent review by Benard (Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:651–673, 2004)) documented how predator cues induce metamorphic changes relative to model predictions. Importantly, however, real predators affect larval prey via several mechanisms beyond simple induction. In this paper, I contrast the leading models of metamorphosis, provide an overview of the multiple ways that predators can directly and indirectly affect larval growth and development (via induction, thinning, and selection), and identify how each process should affect the time to and size at metamorphosis. With this mechanistic foundation established, I then turn to the well-studied model system of larval amphibians to synthesize studies on: (1) caged predators (which cause only induction), and (2) lethal predators (which cause induction, thinning, and selection). Among the caged-predator studies, the chemical cues emitted by predators rarely induce a smaller size at metamorphosis or a shorter time to metamorphosis, which is in direct contrast to theoretical predictions but in agreement with Benard’s (Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:651–673, 2004) review based on a considerably smaller dataset. Among the lethal-predator studies, there is a diversity of outcomes depending upon the relative importance of induction versus thinning with the relative importance of the two processes appearing to change with larval density. Finally, I review the persistent effects of larval predators after metamorphosis including both phenotypic and fitness effects. At the end, I outline a number of future directions to allow researchers to continue gaining insight into how predators affect the metamorphic decisions of their prey.Keywords
This publication has 122 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predator‐mediated phenotypic plasticity in tadpoles of the striped marsh frog, Limnodynastes peroniiAustral Ecology, 2005
- Sequential predator effects across three life stages of the African tree frog, Hyperolius spinigularisOecologia, 2005
- Chytridiomycosis impacts predator-prey interactions in larval amphibian communitiesOecologia, 2004
- Threat of predation negates density effects in larval gray treefrogsOecologia, 2004
- ARE INDUCED DEFENSES COSTLY? CONSEQUENCES OF PREDATOR-INDUCED DEFENSES IN WESTERN TOADS, BUFO BOREASEcology, 2003
- PREDATOR-INDUCED LIFE-HISTORY PLASTICITY UNDER TIME CONSTRAINTS IN POOL FROGSEcology, 2002
- THE MANY FACES OF PREDATION: HOW INDUCTION, SELECTION, AND THINNING COMBINE TO ALTER PREY PHENOTYPESEcology, 2002
- Behaviour and growth of southern leopard frog (Rana sphenocephala) tadpoles: effects of food and predation riskCanadian Journal of Zoology, 2001
- Interacting effects of predation risk and food availability on larval anuran behaviour and developmentOecologia, 2000
- Effects of cover and predator size on survival and development of Ranautricularia tadpolesOecologia, 1998