DNA Ligands as Radioprotectors: Molecular Studies with Hoechst 33342 and Hoechst 33258
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Radiation Biology
- Vol. 61 (1) , 69-81
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09553009214550641
Abstract
Following earlier reports of radioprotection of cells by Hoechst 33342, we have investigated radioprotection of isolated DNA by the minor groove binders Hoechst 33258 and Hoechst 33342. Analysis of radiation-induced single strand breakage in plasmid DNA (pBR322) showed concentration-dependant protection, up to a dose-modifying factor of 9·3 for 25 µm Hoechst 33258, at which the ligand: bp ratio was 0·67. Since the ligands bind at discrete sites along DNA, sequencing gel analysis was used to investigate the radioprotective effects of the ligands both at and between the ligand-binding sites. These experiments showed that although protection was more pronounced at the binding sites, there was also some reduction in strand-breakage between binding sites. Detailed analysis at a particular site, the EcoR 1 site in a 3′-32P-endlabelled 100bp restriction fragment from pBR322, showed that protection was most pronounced at the ‘inner T’: GAATTC. Irradiation of a synthetic oligodeoxynucleotide containing a single ligand-binding site, and labelled at the 5′-end, gave the expected doublet bands in high resolution gels, corresponding to fragments with 3′-phosphoryl- and 3′-phosphorylglycollate terminii. In the Hoechst 33258-protected sample, the 3′-phosphorylglycollate band was preferentially suppressed within the binding site. These results, together with published crystal structure data for a Hoechst 33258/dodecamer complex, suggest that the site-specific radioprotection may be due to H-atom donation from the benzimidazole NH groups in the ligand to radiation-induced radicals on 4′-deoxyribosyl carbons. In contrast to the experiments with purified DNA, in which the two ligands yielded similar results, Hoechst 33342 was a much more active radioprotector in experiments with intact cells. For 20 μm Hoechst 33342, the dose-modifying factor was 1·7 at 1% survival and 1·3 at 10% survival, whereas the same level of Hoechst 33258 yielded barely detectable protection, perhaps due to a demonstrably lower cellular uptake. Presumably the radioprotection of cells by Hoechst 33342 is due to suppression of DNA strand breakage, and further investigation of the protection mechanism(s) should enable development of improved radioprotectors.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- DNA Base and Strand Damage in X-irradiated Monkey CV-1 Cells: Influence of Pretreatment Using Small Doses of RadiationInternational Journal of Radiation Biology, 1990
- ‘SPKK’ motifs prefer to bind to DNA at A/T-rich sites.The EMBO Journal, 1989
- Binding of a Hoechst dye to d(CGCGATATCGCG) and its influence on the conformation of the DNA fragmentBiochemistry, 1989
- Gel electrophoresis method for quantitation of gamma ray induced single‐ and double‐strand breaks in DNA irradiated in vitroElectrophoresis, 1989
- DNA Damage in Frozen Aqueous Solution: Sequence Dependence and end GroupsFree Radical Research Communications, 1989
- The Role of Hydroxyl Radical Quenching in the Protection by Acetate and Ethylenediaminetetraacetate of Supercoiled Plasmid DNA from Ionizing Radiation-induced Strand BreakageInternational Journal of Radiation Biology, 1988
- The effects of ionizing radiation on deoxyribonucleic acid. Part 5. The rôle of thiols in chemical repairJournal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2, 1987
- The effects of ionising radiation on deoxyribonucleic acid. Part 4. The role of hydrogen peroxideJournal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2, 1986
- Cell selection from a murine tumour using the fluorescent probe Hoechst 33342British Journal of Cancer, 1985
- Use of Hoechst 33342 for cell selection from multicell systems.Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, 1982