Photometric Redshifts and Selection of High-Redshift Galaxies in the NTT and Hubble Deep Fields
Open Access
- 1 November 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astronomical Journal
- Vol. 120 (5) , 2206-2219
- https://doi.org/10.1086/316803
Abstract
We present and compare in this paper new photometric redshift catalogs of the galaxies in three public fields: the NTT Deep Field, the HDF-N, and the HDF-S. In the case of the NTT Deep Field, we present here a new photometric catalog, obtained by combining the existing BVrI and JKs with new deep U observations acquired with NTT-SUSI2, and which includes also the contiguous field centered on the zem = 4.7 quasar BR 1202-07. Photometric redshifts have been obtained for the whole sample (NTTDF + HDF-N + HDF-S), by adopting a χ2 minimization technique on a spectral library drawn from the Bruzual and Charlot synthesis models, with the addition of dust and intergalactic absorption. The accuracy, determined from 125 galaxies with known spectroscopic redshifts, is σz ~ 0.08 (0.3) in the redshift intervals z = 0–1.5 (1.5–3.5). The global redshift distribution of I-selected galaxies shows a distinct peak at intermediate redshifts, z 0.6 at IAB ≤ 26 and z 0.8 at IAB ≤ 27.5 followed by a tail extending to z 6. Systematic differences exist among the fields, most notably the HDF-S which contains a much smaller number of galaxies at z 0.9 and at z ≥ 4.5 than the HDF-N. We also present for the first time the redshift distribution of the total IR-selected sample to faint limits (Ks ≤ 21 and J ≤ 22). It is found that the number density of galaxies at 1.25 < z < 1.5 is 0.1 arcmin-2 at J ≤ 21 and 1.0 arcmin-2 at J ≤ 22 and drops to 0.3 arcmin-2 (at J ≤ 22) at 1.5 < z < 2. The HDF data sets are used to compare the different results from color selection criteria and photometric redshifts in detecting galaxies in the redshift range 3.5 ≤ z ≤ 4.5. Photometric redshifts predict a number of high z candidates in both the HDF-N and HDF-S that is nearly 2 times larger than color selection criteria, and it is shown that this is primarily due to the inclusion of dusty models that were discarded in the original color selection criteria. In several cases, the selection of these objects is made possible by the additional constraints from the IR bands. This effect partially reflect the poor spectral sampling of the HDF filter set, and is not present in ground-based observations where a R-I ≤ 0.5 color selection criteria may be applied. Finally, it is shown that galactic M stars may mimic z > 5 candidates in the HDF filter set and that the four brightest candidates at z > 5 in the HDF-S are indeed most likely M stars.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Caltech Faint Galaxy Redshift Survey. X. A Redshift Survey in the Region of the Hubble Deep Field NorthThe Astrophysical Journal, 2000
- Bayesian Photometric Redshift EstimationThe Astrophysical Journal, 2000
- Reconstructing Galaxy Spectral Energy Distributions from Broadband PhotometryThe Astronomical Journal, 2000
- Measuring and modelling the redshift evolution of clustering: the Hubble Deep Field NorthMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1999
- Direct measurement of the secular pulsational variation of the DOV star PG 1159-035Open Astronomy, 1998
- The Evolution of the Global Star Formation History as Measured from the Hubble Deep FieldThe Astrophysical Journal, 1997
- FAINT BLUE GALAXIESAnnual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1997
- SExtractor: Software for source extractionAstronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 1996
- Reddenings derived from H I and galaxy counts - Accuracy and mapsThe Astronomical Journal, 1982
- Colors and magnitudes predicted for high redshift galaxiesThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 1980