Racial Disparities in Access to Renal Transplantation — Clinically Appropriate or Due to Underuse or Overuse?
Top Cited Papers
- 23 November 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 343 (21) , 1537-1544
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200011233432106
Abstract
Despite abundant evidence of racial disparities in the use of surgical procedures, it is uncertain whether these disparities reflect racial differences in clinical appropriateness or overuse or underuse of care. We performed a literature review and used an expert panel to develop criteria for determining the appropriateness of renal transplantation for patients with end-stage renal disease. Using data from five states and the District of Columbia on patients who had started to undergo dialysis in 1996 or 1997, we selected a random sample of 1518 patients (age range, 18 to 54 years), stratified according to race and sex. We classified the appropriateness of patients as candidates for transplantation and analyzed data on rates of referral to a transplantation center for evaluation, placement on a waiting list, and receipt of a transplant according to race. Black patients were less likely than white patients to be rated as appropriate candidates for transplantation according to appropriateness criteria based on expert opinion (71 blacks [9.0 percent] vs. 152 whites [20.9 percent]) and were more likely to have had incomplete evaluations (368 [46.5 percent] vs. 282 [38.8 percent], P<0.001 for the overall chi-square). Among patients considered to be appropriate candidates for transplantation, blacks were less likely than whites to be referred for evaluation, according to the chart review (90.1 percent vs. 98.0 percent, P=0.008), to be placed on a waiting list (71.0 percent vs. 86.7 percent, P=0.007), or to undergo transplantation (16.9 percent vs. 52.0 percent, P<0.001). Among patients classified as inappropriate candidates, whites were more likely than blacks to be referred for evaluation (57.8 percent vs. 38.4 percent), to be placed on a waiting list (30.9 percent vs. 17.4 percent), and to undergo transplantation (10.3 percent vs. 2.2 percent, P<0.001 for all three comparisons). Racial disparities in rates of renal transplantation stem from differences in clinical characteristics that affect appropriateness as well as from underuse of transplantation among blacks and overuse among whites. Reducing racial disparities will require efforts to distinguish their specific causes and the development of interventions tailored to address them.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Mortality in All Patients on Dialysis, Patients on Dialysis Awaiting Transplantation, and Recipients of a First Cadaveric TransplantNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- The Effect of Patients' Preferences on Racial Differences in Access to Renal TransplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Development of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOLTM) InstrumentQuality of Life Research, 1994
- Physician discretion and racial variation in the use of surgical proceduresArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1994
- Comparison of survival probabilities for dialysis patients vs cadaveric renal transplant recipientsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- Racial Differences in the Use of Invasive Cardiovascular Procedures in the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical SystemNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Access to kidney transplantation. Has the United States eliminated income and racial differences?Archives of internal medicine (1960), 1988
- Age, sex, and race inequality in renal transplantationArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1988
- Effect of Transplantation on the Medicare End-Stage Renal Disease ProgramNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- The Quality of Life of Patients with End-Stage Renal DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985