Are reported preterm birth rates reliable? An analysis of interhospital differences in the calculation of the weeks of gestation at delivery and preterm birth rate
Open Access
- 16 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 111 (2) , 160-163
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.00026.x
Abstract
We investigated the possibility of preterm birth misclassification as a determinant of variation in its reported rates. Using a database of 497,105 deliveries from 17 hospitals, the best estimate of gestational age made at delivery and entered into the database at that time was recalculated from the menstrual dates and mid‐trimester ultrasound scan. The recalculated completed weeks of gestation at delivery was compared with that made at birth. Calculation of estimated gestational age varied between hospitals due to inconsistencies in ‘rounding’ and ‘truncating’ the weeks of gestation at delivery. This resulted in preterm birth misclassification rates of up to 10.1%.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epidemiology of Preterm Delivery in Two Birth Cohorts with an Interval of 20 YearsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1995
- The quality of routinely collected maternity dataBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1994
- Prematurity, postdates, and growth retardation: The influence of use of ultrasonography on reported gestational ageAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989
- Assessment of an on-line computerized perinatal data collection and information systemBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1986
- Who: Recommended Definitions, Terminology and Format for Statistical Tables Related to The Perinatal Period And Use of A New Certificate For Cause of Perinatal DeathsPublished by Taylor & Francis ,1977