Long-term effects of selection based on the animal model BLUP in a finite population
- 1 December 1993
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Theoretical and Applied Genetics
- Vol. 87 (4) , 446-454
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00215090
Abstract
Monte Carlo simulation was used to assess the long-term effects of truncation selection within small populations using indices (I=ωf+m) combining mid-parent [f=(a i+a d)/2] and Mendelian-sampling (m=a-f) evaluations provided by an animal model BLUP (a=f+m). Phenotypic values of panmictic populations were generated for 30 discrete generations. Assuming a purely additive polygenic model, heritability (h 2) values were 0.10, 0.25 or 0.50. Two population sizes were considered: five males and 25 females selected out of 50 candidates of each sex (small populations, S) and 50 males and 250 females selected out of 500 candidates in each sex (large populations, L). Selection was carried out on the index defined above with ω = 1 (animal model BLUP), ω=1/2, or ω=0 (selection on within-family deviations). Mass selection was also considered. Selection based on the animal model BLUP (ω=1) maximized the cumulative genetic gain in L populations. In S populations, selection using ω = 1/2 and mass selection were more efficient than selection under an animal model (+ 3 to + 7% and + 1 to + 4% respectively, depending on h 2). Selection on within-family deviations always led to the lowest gains. In most cases, the variance of response to selection between replicates did not depend on the selection method. The within-replicate genetic variance and the average coefficient of inbreeding (F) were highly affected by selection with ω=1 or 1/2, especially in populations of size S. As expected, selection based on within-family deviations was less detrimental in that respect. The number of copies of founder neutral genes at a separate locus, and the probability vector of origin of the genes in reference to the founder animals, were also observed in addition to F values. The conclusion was that selection procedures placing less emphasis on family information might be interesting alternatives to selection based on animal model BLUP, especially for small populations with long-term selection objectives.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incidence de la sélection et de l'homogamie sur les paramètres du modèle génétique additifGenetics Selection Evolution, 1990
- Optimization of selection response under restricted inbreedingGenetics Selection Evolution, 1990
- Prediction of rates of inbreeding in selected populationsGenetics Research, 1990
- Inbreeding Under Selection from Unrelated FamiliesPublished by JSTOR ,1984
- Size of population required for artificial selectionGenetics Research, 1980
- The effect of selection on genetic variability: a simulation studyGenetics Research, 1976
- A Simple Method for Computing the Inverse of a Numerator Relationship Matrix Used in Prediction of Breeding ValuesPublished by JSTOR ,1976
- A note on increasing the limit of selection through selection within familiesGenetics Research, 1974
- Inbreeding in artificial selection programmesGenetics Research, 1961
- Chance as a Cause of Changes in Gene Frequency Within Pure Breeds of LivestockThe American Naturalist, 1946