At‐sea distribution and scale‐dependent foraging behaviour of petrels and albatrosses: a comparative study
Top Cited Papers
- 27 November 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Animal Ecology
- Vol. 76 (1) , 9-19
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01186.x
Abstract
1. In order to study and predict population distribution, it is crucial to identify and understand factors affecting individual movement decisions at different scales. Movements of foraging animals should be adjusted to the hierarchical spatial distribution of resources in the environment and this scale-dependent response to environmental heterogeneity should differ according to the forager's characteristics and exploited habitats. 2. Using First-Passage Time analysis, we studied scales of search effort and habitat used by individuals of seven sympatric Indian Ocean Procellariiform species fitted with satellite transmitters. We characterized their search effort distribution and examined whether species differ in scale-dependent adjustments of their movements according to the marine environment exploited. 3. All species and almost all individuals (91% of 122 individuals) exhibited an Area-Restricted Search (ARS) during foraging. At a regional scale (1000s km), foraging ranges showed a large spatial overlap between species. At a smaller scale (100s km, at which an increase in search effort occurred), a segregation in environmental characteristics of ARS zones (where search effort is high) was found between species. 4. Spatial scales at which individuals increased their search effort differed between species and also between exploited habitats, indicating a similar movement adjustment for predators foraging in the same habitat. ARS zones of the two populations of wandering albatross Diomedea exulans (Crozet and Kerguelen) were similar in their adjustments (i.e. same ARS scale) as well as in their environmental characteristics. These two populations showed a weak spatial overlap in their foraging distribution, with males foraging in more southerly waters than females in both populations. 5. This study demonstrates that predators of several species adjust their foraging behaviour to the heterogeneous environment and these scale-dependent movement adjustments depend on both forager and environment characteristics.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantitative analysis of bottlenose dolphin movement patterns and their relationship with foragingJournal of Animal Ecology, 2006
- Scales of movement by elk (Cervus elaphus) in response to heterogeneity in forage resources and predation riskLandscape Ecology, 2005
- Scale–dependent hierarchical adjustments of movement patterns in a long–range foraging seabirdProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2003
- Movement parameters of ungulates and scale‐specific responses to the environmentJournal of Animal Ecology, 2002
- Caribou movement as a correlated random walkOecologia, 2000
- Foraging in a Hierarchical Patch SystemThe American Naturalist, 1999
- Surface oceanic fronts between Africa and AntarcticaPublished by Elsevier ,1998
- Model Selection and InferencePublished by Springer Nature ,1998
- Flight tracks and speeds of Antarctic and Atlantic seabirds: radar and optical measurementsPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1993
- Efficiency of area-concentrated searching behaviour in a continuous patchy environmentJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1992