Are angiotensin ii receptor blockers more efficacious than placebo in heart failure? implications of elite-2
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 87 (5) , 606-607
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01439-9
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of losartan compared with captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: randomised trial—the Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study ELITE IIThe Lancet, 2000
- Comparison of Candesartan, Enalapril, and Their Combination in Congestive Heart FailureCirculation, 1999
- Angiotensin-converting enzyme-independent contraction to angiotensin I in human resistance arteries.Circulation, 1999
- Effects of losartan versus captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of patients in the losartan heart failure survival study-ELITE IIJournal of Cardiac Failure, 1999
- Rationale and design of the valsartan heart failure trial: A large multinational trial to assess the effects of valsartan, an angiotensin-receptor blocker, on morbidity and mortality in chronic congestive heart failureJournal of Cardiac Failure, 1999
- Equivalence TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Randomised trial of losartan versus captopril in patients over 65 with heart failure (Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly Study, ELITE)Published by Elsevier ,1997
- Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methodsBMJ, 1996
- Effect of Enalapril on Survival in Patients with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fractions and Congestive Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trialsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1985