Structural analysis of human and bovine .alpha.-fetoprotein by electron microscopy, image processing, and circular dichroism
- 30 November 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Biochemistry
- Vol. 22 (25) , 5978-5981
- https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00294a043
Abstract
The images of human and bovine .alpha.-fetoprotein molecules were enhanced by combining dark-field EM with a laser-assisted optical system. This system filters out random background noise while permitting true averaged signal reconstruction of the molecule. A single averaged molecular image was digitized into a matrix, each pixel being assigned a gray scale level to produce a relative mass map for each molecule. These maps were interpreted from the .alpha.-helix, .beta.-form and random coil of the purified proteins as determined by circular dichroism (CD). Results showed that both molecules are U-shaped apparently monomeric, with outside dimensions of .apprx. 80 .ANG.. Both molecules have asymmetrical structural features, notably 3 mass dense regions at both extremities and at the vertex of the molecules. CD data suggest a high degree of similar stabilized .alpha.-helix and extensive .beta.-form in these regions. Mass map analysis of human .alpha.-fetoprotein correlates with the subdomains organized by disulfide bridges.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Primary structures of human alpha-fetoprotein and its mRNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1983
- Intragenic amplification and divergence in the mouse α-fetoprotein geneNature, 1981
- Bovine fetus-specific serum proteins Purification and characterization of α1-fetoprotein and immunological identification of α2- and β-fetoproteinsBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure, 1978
- Signal to noise enhancement in dark field electron micrographs of vasopressin: filtering of arrays of images in reciprocal spaceJournal of Microscopy, 1977
- Rat alpha-fetoprotein: isolation, radioimmunoassay and fetal-maternal distribution during pregnancyReproduction, 1976