A retrospective comparison of current and proposed staging and scoring systems for persistent gestational trophoblastic disease
- 3 July 2000
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer
- Vol. 10 (4) , 318-322
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1438.2000.010004318.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Combining the staging system of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics with the scoring system of the World Heath Organization for Trophoblastic Neoplasia. Report of the Working Committee of the International Society for the Study of Trophoblastic Disease and the International Gynecologic Cancer SocietyInternational Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, 2000
- Chorionic TumorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- An evaluation of the prognostic factors in metastatic gestational trophoblastic diseaseInternational Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, 1994
- Correlation between clinical staging (FIGO) and prognostic groups with gestational trophoblastic diseaseBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993
- FIGO NewsInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1992
- Metastatic gestational trophoblastic disease: A comparison of prognostic classification systemsGynecologic Oncology, 1992
- Prognostic factors in gestational trophoblastic tumors: A proposed new scoring system based on multivariate analysisAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1991
- Risk factors in gestational trophoblastic disease, and consequences for primary treatmentEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1986
- Risk and prognostic factors in trophoblastic neoplasiaCancer, 1976
- Treatment of metastatic trophoblastic disease: Good and poor prognosisAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1973