Quantifying the local‐scale uncertainty of estimated actual evapotranspiration
- 21 October 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Hydrological Processes
- Vol. 18 (17) , 3415-3434
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1504
Abstract
In this study, we quantified the local‐scale uncertainty of the actual evapotranspiration estimated from a water balance approach combining two soil‐water‐content measurement techniques (time‐domain reflectometry and neutron probe sounding). The local‐scale uncertainty was quantified for 28 sampling points located within a small maize cropped field. This was done by determining progressively the expected value and uncertainty on soil‐water content, soil‐water storage, soil‐water storage variation and on bottom flux. This latter term was quantified using two different hydraulic conductivity curves (HCC), derived from a pedotransfer function (PTF) and from field measurements. Results show that uncertainty on a soil water storage estimate for the considered experimental measurements in terms of standard deviation range between 9·72 and 10·37 mm. This uncertainty is related mainly to the calibration of the soil‐water content measurement instruments. For a soil‐water storage variation estimate, the uncertainty is smaller, with values ranging between 3·48 and 5·42 mm. In this case, the main component of the total variance is the instrumental variance and the variance resulting from the technique used to integrate soil‐water‐content measurements. The expected values and uncertainties for the bottom fluxes were significantly different for the two different HCC characterization techniques in some places in the field. For estimated ET fluxes with in situ estimated HCC results show that the uncertainty ranges in terms of standard deviation between 3·82 and 5·97 mm. It should be stressed that these values can be considered as very low and that a better precision is probably very difficult to obtain as all sensitive factors contributing to the ET variance have been determined in a consistent and optimal way. Finally, it is shown that the uncertainties in estimated HCC with PTFs may result in large uncertainties in estimated ET, questioning thereby the use of PTFs in characterizing the field water balance. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inversely estimating soil hydraulic functions using evapotranspiration fluxesJournal of Hydrology, 2001
- Water balance of apricot trees (Prunus armeniaca L. cv. Búlida) under drip irrigationAgricultural Water Management, 2001
- Evapotranspiration, Yield, and Water Use Efficiency of Corn Hybrids Differing in MaturityAgronomy Journal, 1998
- SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES IN A MULTI-LAYERED SOIL PROFILESoil Science, 1996
- Rainfall interception and evaporation from soil below a wheat canopyAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1994
- Improved Calibration of Time Domain Reflectometry Soil Water Content MeasurementsSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1993
- Automatic, real‐time monitoring of soil moisture in a remote field area with time domain reflectometryWater Resources Research, 1991
- A method of measuring soil moisture by time-domain reflectometryJournal of Hydrology, 1986
- ERROR ANALYSIS IN ESTIMATING SOIL WATER CONTENT FROM NEUTRON PROBE MEASUREMENTSSoil Science, 1984
- Contribution des réserves profondes du sol au bilan hydrique des cultures. Détermination et importanceAgronomy for Sustainable Development, 1984