Comparison of Solution‐Based versus Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry for Analysis of Larval Fish Otolith Microelemental Composition
- 9 January 2006
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
- Vol. 135 (1) , 218-231
- https://doi.org/10.1577/t04-165.1
Abstract
Otolith microchemistry has become a widely used tool for fisheries‐based research in marine systems. However, its application to systems without well‐defined juvenile nursery areas in which distinct otolith elemental signatures can develop (i.e., most freshwater systems) remains limited. In large part, this deficiency is due to unsuitable protocols for reliably processing and analyzing small otoliths of larvae. Herein, we evaluate the abilities of solution‐based (SO) and laser ablation (LA) inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS) to quantify the otolith elemental composition of larval yellow perch Perca flavescens captured in three distinct spawning locations in Lake Erie (USA–Canada). Analysis of otolith pairs by each technique demonstrated that both SO‐ and LA‐ICPMS could be used to reliably quantify the more abundant elements, such as Sr and Ba. Magnesium and zinc, analyzed by use of both SO‐ and LA‐ICPMS, also met the criteria for inclusion in our analyses (i.e., the coefficients of variation of standards were <10.5%, and over 90% of samples were above detection limits at a single location). Upon closer inspection of the data, however, we found that estimates of Mg and Zn were only reliable for LA‐ICPMS. Estimates of these two elements using SO‐ICPMS were unrealistically high, probably owing to contamination during the otolith dissolution and handling phases. We also found that LA‐ICPMS provided more precise estimates than did SO‐ICPMS for nearly all elements explored, but LA‐ICPMS was somewhat limited by high limits of detection for some elements. Despite these differences, both techniques could accurately discriminate among larvae produced in different Lake Erie spawning locations, primarily because of the significant variation in Sr among larval otoliths. Ultimately, although both methods are appropriate for analysis of otoliths from larvae, we recommend the use of LA‐ICPMS in future otolith microchemical applications involving larvae.Keywords
Funding Information
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reconstructing Habitat Use and Wetland Nursery Origin of Yellow Perch from Lake Superior using Otolith Elemental AnalysisJournal of Great Lakes Research, 2004
- The detection of elements in larval otoliths from Atlantic herring using laser ablation ICP-MSJournal of Fish Biology, 2003
- Otoliths, increments, and elements: keys to a comprehensive understanding of fish populations?Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2001
- Timing of metamorphosis and larval segregation of the Atlantic eels Anguilla rostrata and A . anguilla , as revealed by otolith microstructure and microchemistryMarine Biology, 2000
- Strontium and barium uptake in aragonitic otoliths of marine fishGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2000
- Chemistry and composition of fish otoliths:pathways, mechanisms and applicationsMarine Ecology Progress Series, 1999
- Comparison of accuracy, precision, and sensitivity in elemental assays of fish otoliths using the electron microprobe, proton-induced X-ray emission, and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometryCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1997
- Drastic changes in otolith microstructure and microchemistry accompanying the onset of metamorphosis in the Japanese eel Anguilla japonicaMarine Ecology Progress Series, 1997
- Elemental fingerprinting of fish otoliths using ID-ICPMSMarine Ecology Progress Series, 1995
- Microstructure of Fish OtolithsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1985