Distributed entanglement
Top Cited Papers
- 10 April 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review A
- Vol. 61 (5) , 052306
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.61.052306
Abstract
Consider three qubits A, B, and C which may be entangled with each other. We show that there is a trade-off between A’s entanglement with B and its entanglement with C. This relation is expressed in terms of a measure of entanglement called the concurrence, which is related to the entanglement of formation. Specifically, we show that the squared concurrence between A and B, plus the squared concurrence between A and C, cannot be greater than the squared concurrence between A and the pair BC. This inequality is as strong as it could be, in the sense that for any values of the concurrences satisfying the corresponding equality, one can find a quantum state consistent with those values. Further exploration of this result leads to a definition of an essential three-way entanglement of the system, which is invariant under permutations of the qubits.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bound on distillable entanglementPhysical Review A, 1999
- Rigorous treatment of distillable entanglementPhysical Review A, 1999
- Mixed-State Entanglement and Distillation: Is there a “Bound” Entanglement in Nature?Physical Review Letters, 1998
- Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two QubitsPhysical Review Letters, 1998
- Entanglement measures and purification proceduresPhysical Review A, 1998
- Statistical inference, distinguishability of quantum states, and quantum entanglementPhysical Review A, 1997
- Entanglement of a Pair of Quantum BitsPhysical Review Letters, 1997
- Quantifying EntanglementPhysical Review Letters, 1997
- Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correctionPhysical Review A, 1996
- Concentrating partial entanglement by local operationsPhysical Review A, 1996