The end of science revisited
- 9 August 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in Computer
- Vol. 37 (1) , 37-43
- https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2004.1260723
Abstract
Because science has advanced so rapidly over the past century or so, we assume that it can and will continue to do so, possibly forever. But science itself tells us that there are limits to our knowledge. The book "End of Science" argued that science - especially pure science, the grand request to understand the universe and our place in it - might be entering an era of diminishing returns. We would like to see a greater recognition of science's limitations, particularly in mind-related fields, where our desire for self-knowledge can make us susceptible to pseudo scientific cults such as Marxism, social Darwinism, eugenics, and psychoanalysis. Science is never more dangerous than when it seeks to tell us what we are, what we can be, and even what we should be.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- A New Intellectual Framework for PsychiatryAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1998
- Lighter than airNature, 1996
- Scientific psychology: Should we bury it or praise it?New Ideas in Psychology, 1992
- The machine as partner of the new professional: Today's instruments are providing more data than the mind can process; expert systems are coming to the rescue but may soon usurp human rolesIEEE Spectrum, 1984
- The education of Henry AdamsPublished by Smithsonian Institution ,1918