Does knowledge guide practice? Another look at the management of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
To describe Canadian doctors' beliefs about the appropriate role of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the management of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A mail survey of a random sample of Canadian respirologists, thoracic surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists was performed. Three cases of NSCLC were described and respondents were asked to estimate the prognosis in each case and to give their treatment recommendations. Responses were obtained from 234 of 330 eligible subjects (74%). Doctors' treatment recommendations varied widely. After a complete resection for stage II NSCLC, 68% recommended no adjuvant treatment, 28% recommended radiotherapy, 1% recommended chemotherapy, and 3% recommended both radiotherapy and chemotherapy. For an asymptomatic patient with stage IIIb NSCLC, 17% recommended no active treatment, 65% recommended radiotherapy alone, 16% recommended radiation and chemotherapy, and 2% recommended chemotherapy alone. For an asymptomatic patient with a stage IV NSCLC, 80% recommended no active treatment and 20% recommended chemotherapy. Doctors' beliefs about the natural history of NSCLC and its response to treatment varied widely. Seventy-five percent of respondents believed that adjuvant radiotherapy did not increase survival in stage II disease, but 25% believed that it did. Thirty percent believed that the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy in stage III increased survival, but 70% believed that it did not. Fifty-five percent believed that chemotherapy increased the median survival in stage IV, but 45% believed that it did not. Doctors' beliefs about the efficacy of treatment were strongly associated with their treatment recommendations. Personal beliefs, rather than universal knowledge, currently guide the management of NSCLC in Canada.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: