Micrometeorological and chamber methods for measurement of nitrous oxide fluxes between soils and the atmosphere: Overview and conclusions
Open Access
- 20 August 1994
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Vol. 99 (D8) , 16541-16548
- https://doi.org/10.1029/94jd00619
Abstract
Emissions of N2O from agricultural grassland fertilized with 185 kg N ha−1 have been measured using a range of chamber and micrometeorological methods at a common site in the lowlands of Scotland. Measurements were made over similar periods (30 to 60 min) by all methods, but the areas over which the fluxes were measured ranged from 0.008 m2 for the smallest chambers to 104 to 105 m2 for the micrometeorological methods. The fluxes measured using chambers ranged from less than 10 to more than 1700 ng N2O‐N m−2 s−1; they were a factor of 3 larger from a previously grazed area than from the remainder. Fluxes showed great spatial variability and also a general decline with time following a peak after fertilization. Micrometeorological measurements were made by eddy correlation using fast‐response tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS) and by aerodynamic (flux gradient) methods using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), gas chromatography (GC), and TDLAS. All of the flux gradient methods provided similar fluxes of N2O over the ungrazed section of the field, with averages over the measurement period in the range 52 to 55 ng N2O‐N m−2 s−1. Eddy correlation measurements with the TDL averaged 85 and 43 ng m−2 s−1 on the two days when measurements were made. Mean fluxes from the chamber methods, using GC, FTIR, and long‐path infrared spectroscopy to detect N2O, were larger than those from the micrometeorology and ranged from 280 ng N2O‐N m−2 s−1 for the smallest chambers to 210 ng N2O‐N m−2 s−1 for the 0.13/0.49 m2 chambers and 300 ng N2O‐N m−2 s−1 for the 62 m2 chamber. The different techniques employed averaged over different spatial scales, and the measurements related to different areas of the field. Nonetheless, the different micrometeorological methods gave similar fluxes. The higher values obtained by the chamber methods may have been due either to the spatial variability of the fluxes at the site, with the chambers being located in regions of relatively greater source strength, or to factors associated with the methods themselves.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measurement of N2O emission from a fertilized grassland: An analysis of spatial variabilityJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1994
- Automated gas chromatographic analysis system for micrometeorological measurements of trace gas fluxesJournal of Geophysical Research, 1994
- Measurement of nitrous oxide emissions from fertilized grassland using closed chambersJournal of Geophysical Research, 1994
- Spatial Variation in Denitrification: Dependency of Activity Centers on the Soil EnvironmentSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1990
- Temporal Patterns of Soil Denitrification: Their Stability and CausesSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1990
- Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Fertilized Soils: Summary of Available DataJournal of Environmental Quality, 1990
- Flux Measurement with Conditional SamplingJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 1990
- Spatial Variability of Field‐Measured Denitrification Gas FluxesSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1984
- Nitrous oxide emission from the soil surface: Continuous measurement by gas chromatographySoil Biology and Biochemistry, 1983
- On the Distribution of a Variate Whose Logarithm is Normally DistributedJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1941