The Urban-Rural Cleavage in Political Involvement: The Case of France
- 1 June 1971
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 65 (2) , 341-357
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1954453
Abstract
Rural France is often seen as culturally isolated and politically uninvolved. Using a combination of community studies and survey evidence, one can show that the lack of declared interest in politics of rural Frenchmen seems to mean an absence of involvement in the party system rather than a passivity toward public life. Nevertheless rural France produces higher voting turnouts in local and national elections than are found in other sections or population groups.The weakness of partisan involvement, as opposed to citizen involvement, seems to bespeak not merely apathy, but actual hostility, toward party politics. This political hostility is widespread among French workers but is politically more important among French peasants. Thus voting choices are less party-oriented precisely where urban-based campaign organizations are least effective. Local non-party notables therefore probably play a greater brokerage role in national election campaigns, and election results are less predictable than in the rural sectors of many other societies. The degree of antipartisanship in rural constituencies also seems to encourage candidates to avoid national party labels in election campaigns.Three kinds of factors are suggested to account for both the high citizen involvement and the low partisan involvement: First, historically, the extension of the suffrage to the rural periphery long before the French party system was capable of the same kind of penetration may have habituated rural Frenchmen to the exercise of the vote in a non-partisan context. Second, the achievement of stable landholding for most peasants removes visible class conflict as a legitimizing factor for party organization, while an extensive interest group structure increases the tendency to keep informed, to participate, and to run for local office. Third, the political ecology of the French village both encourages high citizen involvement and discourages partisan involvement. While many of these factors are universal among peasant societies, the particular historical, sociological, and ecological configuration of the French village seems to produce a rural resident who is more informed and active than our inherited wisdom would suggest, but less partisan than are urban citizens with similar levels of involvement.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Peasant Communism in Southern ItalyThe American Historical Review, 1968
- Commune en France. La Métamorphose de PlodémetRevista Mexicana de Sociologia, 1968
- Le maire et l'exercice de ses fonctions dans le département des Alpes-MaritimesRevue française de science politique, 1968
- Society, Schools and Progress in FranceBritish Journal of Educational Studies, 1966
- L'opinion publique au début de l'année 1965Revue française de science politique, 1965
- Politicization of the Electorate in France and the United StatesPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1962
- Social Class in a French VillageAnthropological Quarterly, 1960
- Les Paysans et la Politique dans la France contemporaineRevue économique, 1958
- Village in the VaucluseThe Geographical Journal, 1957
- France against HerselfThe American Catholic Sociological Review, 1955