Evaluation of a new body composition phantom for quality control and cross-calibration of DXA devices
- 1 August 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Applied Physiology
- Vol. 89 (2) , 599-605
- https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2000.89.2.599
Abstract
This study evaluated a new body composition phantom and its use for quality control and cross-calibration of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) instruments for measurements of body composition. We imaged the variable composition phantom (Lunar, Madison, WI) on eight different DXA devices. Deviations of up to 7% fat were observed when we compared the percent fat values measured by the different devices with the nominal values provided by the manufacturer. Absolute precision error of percent fat measurements for the phantom ranged from 0.6 to 0.8%. The phantom's percent fat values were also compared with whole body composition measurements from 130 female and male volunteers. The phantom detected differences in percent fat values that were similar to those found by comparing in vivo measurements with values from different DXA scanner models from the same manufacturer. When comparing different models of scanners from different manufacturers, such as the Hologic QDR-4500 and the Lunar DPX-IQ, the phantom showed a different relationship than was seen for patients. Therefore, corrections or comparisons based on the phantom data alone would be incorrect. In conclusion, the Lunar variable composition phantom is capable of accurately measuring the fat calibration of DXA devices and may be suitable for cross-sectional cross-calibration between scanners from the same manufacturer; however, for comparison of DXA scanners from different manufacturers, in vivo cross-calibration is still the only accurate method. The phantom may be used in longitudinal quality control to verify an instrument's temporal stability.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bone Mineral and Body Composition Measurements: Cross-Calibration of Pencil-Beam and Fan-Beam Dual-Energy X-Ray AbsorptiometersJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1998
- Replacing DXA scanners: Cross-calibration with phantoms may be misleadingCalcified Tissue International, 1996
- Accurate assessment of precision errors: How to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniquesOsteoporosis International, 1995
- Quality control of DXA instruments in multicenter trialsOsteoporosis International, 1995
- Cross calibration of QDR-2000 and QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray densitometers for bone mineral and soft-tissue measurementsBone, 1995
- Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: Patient and phantom cross-calibration resultsJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1994
- Quality assurance for bone densitometry research studies: Concept and impactOsteoporosis International, 1993
- Assessment of the composition of major body regions by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DEXA), with special reference to limb muscle massClinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, 1992
- Evaluation of a new set of calibration standards for the measurement of fat content via DPA and DXAMedical Physics, 1992
- Measurement of lean body mass and total body fat using dual photon absorptiometryMetabolism, 1986