A Tale of Two Curries: Counterfactual Thinking and Accident-Related Judgments
- 1 February 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Vol. 18 (1) , 84-87
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292181012
Abstract
The present research investigated the effects of counterfactual thinking on subjects' accident-related judgments. It was predicted that the availability of counterfactual alternatives for an accident would result in differential evaluation of incident-related victims and perpetrators. The results of two studies strongly supported this prediction. Specifically, subjects awarded more financial compensation to the victim of an accident when it was preceded by exceptional rather than routine circumstances. Similarly, under these conditions the accident perpetrators were deemed to be more negligent in their behavior and a harsher fine was leveled against them.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Temporal order and the perceived mutability of events: Implications for blame assignment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990
- The Role of Counterfactual Thinking in Judgments of AffectPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1990
- Counterfactual Thinking and Social Perception: Thinking about What Might Have BeenAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1990
- Mental simulation of causality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989
- Regret and Elation Following Action and InactionPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1987
- The undoing of scenarios.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987
- Counterfactual Thinking and Victim CompensationPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1986
- Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives.Psychological Review, 1986
- The Knowledge of What Might have BeenPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1986
- The simulation heuristicPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1982