The Effectiveness of Graphic Organizers for Three Classifications of Secondary Students in Content Area Classes
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Learning Disabilities
- Vol. 23 (1) , 12-22
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949002300107
Abstract
The purpose of the Interventions section of the journal is to provide professional practitioners with overviews of successful interventions that can be replicated with individuals with learning disabilities. These interventions can be either physiological or psychoeducational and can occur in school settings, clinics, hospitals, homes, communities, or employment sites. The discussion of these interventions generally includes (a) the theory or rationale of the interventions, (b) previous research findings, (c) characteristics of the individuals receiving the interventions, (d) the intervention that was applied, and (e) the criteria used to evaluate its success. In the first article, Steven V. Horton, Thomas C. Lovitt, and Donna Bergerud of the University of Washington describe the effectiveness of graphic organizers. In the second article, Bernadette Kelly, Russell Gersten, and Douglas Carnine of the University of Oregon describe the importance of curriculum design in teaching fractions. It would appear that careful attention to the use of graphic organizers and a well-designed curriculum can be beneficial in helping students with learning disabilities learn in content area classes and in mathematics, respectively.—JLW Previous research concerning the graphic or visual display of information with academically handicapped students has not addressed the instructional conditions that exist in mainstream settings. This article investigates the effectiveness of graphic organizers for three classifications of secondary students enrolled in content area classes: students with learning disabilities, remedial students, and students in regular education. The results of three separate experiments indicated that graphic organizers, whether teacher-directed, student-directed with text references, or student-directed with clues, produced significantly higher performance than self-study for each group of students. Several practical issues involving the use of graphic organizers with heterogeneous groups of secondary students are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using Study Guides with Three Classifications of Secondary StudentsThe Journal of Special Education, 1989
- The Effectiveness of Textbook Adaptations in Life Science for High School Students with Learning DisabilitiesJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1988
- Facilitating Learning Disabled Students' Acquisition of Science ClassificationsLearning Disability Quarterly, 1985
- Semantic Mapping Improves Reading Comprehension of Learning Disabled StudentsTEACHING Exceptional Children, 1985
- Facilitating the Acquisition of Science Facts in Learning Disabled StudentsAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1985
- A Quantitative and Qualitative Review of Graphic Organizer ResearchThe Journal of Educational Research, 1984
- A classroom training study: The effects of graphic organizer instruction on fourth graders’ comprehensionReading World, 1984
- A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF THE DIFFERENCES IN CHILDREN'S RETENTION OF “INCONSIDERATE” TEXTReading Psychology, 1983
- Memory processes in children with learning disabilities: Evidence for deficient rehearsalJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1977
- The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1960