Why Do People Use Figurative Language?
- 1 May 1994
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 5 (3) , 159-163
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00653.x
Abstract
In this article, we examine the discourse goals that are accomplished by the use of eight forms of figurative language: hyperbole, idiom, indirect request, irony, understatement, metaphor, rhetorical question, and simile. Subjects were asked to provide reasons why they would use a particular figure of speech. Based on their responses, a discourse goal taxonomy that includes each of the eight figures was developed. The goal taxonomy indicates that each figure of speech is used to accomplish a unique constellation of communicative goals. The degree of goal overlap between the eight forms was also calculated, and the results provide support for theoretical claims about the relatedness of certain figures. Taken together, the goal taxonomy and overlap scores broaden our understanding of functional and theoretical differences between the various kinds of figurative language.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity.Psychological Review, 1990
- Metaphors in Conversation: How Are They Understood? Why Are They Used?Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 1989
- Understanding and Literal MeaningCognitive Science, 1989
- Beyond the Lexicon: Creativity in Language ProductionMetaphor and Symbolic Activity, 1988
- Speech act theory in quantitative research on interpersonal behavior∗Discourse Processes, 1985
- Literal Meaning and Psychological Theory*Cognitive Science, 1984
- A critical examination of the contribution of literal meaning to understanding nonliteral discourseText & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, 1982
- Your wish is my command: Convention and context in interpreting indirect requestsJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1981
- Prose Comprehension Beyond the WordPublished by Springer Nature ,1981
- Elements of a Plan‐Based Theory of Speech Acts*Cognitive Science, 1979