Privatization in Health and Human Services: A Critique
- 1 April 1992
- journal article
- Published by Duke University Press in Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
- Vol. 17 (2) , 233-254
- https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-17-2-233
Abstract
Privatization currently enjoys wide appeal as a solution to public problems. Supporters of privatization hope that shifting responsibility for the funding, administration, and delivery of services to private organizations and individuals will spur market competition and thus lower costs, improve service effectiveness, and enhance program quality. An increasingly common form of privatization in health and human services is contracting with nonprofit organizations. Such contracting, in practice, does not follow market principles but is, instead, fraught with politics and inadequate information and built on long-term relationships between government and contract agencies. The operations and practices of contracting have important implications for the ongoing debate on the desirability of vouchers for health care insurance and for reform in the contracting process.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incentive contracting in mental health: State and local relationsAdministration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 1990
- Competitive Bidding and States' Purchase of Services: The Case of Mental Health Care in MassachusettsJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1986
- Voluntary Agencies in the Welfare StatePublished by University of California Press ,1981
- The case for performance contractingAdministration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 1981
- The Role of Nonprofit EnterpriseThe Yale Law Journal, 1980
- How Much Do Government Services Really Cost?Urban Affairs Quarterly, 1979