Risk compensation, motivation, injuries, and biomechanics in competitive sport: Figure 1
Open Access
- 23 December 2004
- journal article
- leader
- Published by BMJ in British Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 39 (1) , 2-3
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2004.016188
Abstract
Science and medical researchers and practitioners working in the field of sports injury prevention tend to have very tangible objectives and focus on identifying and solving specific injury risks. There is an uncertainty, however, that “solving” one problem may not simply create another. As the field matures, it is worth considering whether theories and models can be developed that have more general application to a range of injury issues. There is a need for an integrated perspective on sports injury that is inclusive of medical, behavioural (psychological, sociological, and organisational), physiological, and biomechanical factors. On the one hand, training and skills development are advocated as the best methods to reduce injury, but injury rates appear only to increase the more competitively a person approaches sport. This leads to the questions: are significant reductions in sports injury risk possible at all—or in only very specific sports, age groups, or competition levels—and only through absolute reductions in exposure, or after reconsideration of injury prevention methods?Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk CompensationClinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 2004
- Prevention of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Female Team Handball Players: A Prospective Intervention Study Over Three SeasonsClinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 2003
- Evidence for the aetiology of injuries in Australian footballBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2001
- Effectiveness of headgear in a pilot study of under 15 rugby union footballBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2001
- What do under 15 year old schoolboy rugby union players think about protective headgear?British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2001