Unionization among Racial and Ethnic Minorities
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in ILR Review
- Vol. 46 (2) , 284-301
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399304600205
Abstract
Using data on 23–30-year-olds from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, the author presents the first comparative economic analysis of union coverage among black, Hispanic, Asian, and white workers in the United States. Coverage is found to be highest in this age group for blacks, followed by Hispanics, non-Hispanic whites, and Asians. Contrary to common belief, immigrants average higher rates of unionization than natives. Once the regression analysis takes into account the larger proportions of urban, immigrant, and less-educated workers in the Hispanic sample, the differences in demand for unionization among comparable whites, Asians, and Hispanics fall to insignificance. Blacks tend to exhibit a markedly stronger demand for representation than comparable workers from other groups.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Race, Ethnicity, Union Attitudes, and Voting PredilectionsIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1991
- A Note on the Severity of the Decline in Union Organizing ActivityILR Review, 1990
- Male-female differences in the potential for union growth outside traditionally unionized industriesJournal of Labor Research, 1987
- The Determinants of Workers' Union Status: Evidence from the National Longitudinal SurveysThe Journal of Human Resources, 1985
- Right-to-Work Laws and the Extent of UnionizationJournal of Labor Economics, 1984
- The Determination of the Union Status of WorkersEconometrica, 1983
- Union dues and wage premiumsJournal of Labor Research, 1983
- Determinants of U.S. Unionism: Past Research and Future NeedsIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1982
- United States Immigration Policy and Unsanctioned MigrantsILR Review, 1980
- Guestworkers: Lessons from Western EuropeILR Review, 1980