Estimating Pollution Abatement Costs: A Comparison of 'Stated' and 'Revealed' Approaches
Preprint
- 17 December 2003
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
Surveys have been the principal method used to estimate costs associated with environmental regulations in the United States. Although surveys have been widely used, there are concerns about their accuracy. In order to investigate the accuracy of survey estimates of pollution abatement costs, a joint production model is specified and data from electric power plants in the United States for 1994 and 1995 are used to estimate pollution abatement costs incurred by these plants. The estimates of pollution abatement costs generated by the joint production model are then compared with survey estimates of pollution abatement costs incurred by power plants.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Published by Springer Nature ,2011
- Sulfur Dioxide Control by Electric Utilities: What Are the Gains from Trade?Journal of Political Economy, 2000
- Allocation of CO2 Emissions Permits: A General Equilibrium Analysis of Policy InstrumentsJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2000
- Empirical evidence of advances in scrubber technologyResource and Energy Economics, 1998
- The Price of Pollution: A Dual Approach to Valuing SO2AllowancesJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1996
- Derivation of Shadow Prices for Undesirable Outputs: A Distance Function ApproachThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1993
- Cost-Minimizing Regulation of Sulfur Emissions: Regional Gains in Electric PowerThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1985
- Environmental Regulations and Productivity Growth: The Case of Fossil-fueled Electric Power GenerationJournal of Political Economy, 1983
- The role of air and water residuals for steam electric power generationJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1983
- CONCEPTUAL AMD STATISTICAL ISSUES IN DEVELOPING ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES‐RECENT U.S. EXPERIENCEReview of Income and Wealth, 1977