Stealing From a "Lost" Letter
- 1 December 1980
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Criminal Justice and Behavior
- Vol. 7 (4) , 423-436
- https://doi.org/10.1177/009385488000700406
Abstract
A nonreactive field experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of the victim on stealing. The subjects were 160 people in the streets of London, England, who picked up a stamped, addressed, unsealed, apparently lost letter containing a handwritten note and (except in control conditions) also £1 in cash. The content of the note made it appear that the possible victim of stealing was male or female, old or young, rich or poor, an individual or an association. It was found that subjects were more likely to steal from males than from females, but stealing was not significantly influenced by the other independent variables. Subjects who were younger or more casually dressed were more likely to steal than others. Stealing did not vary with the subject's sex. It was concluded that stealing depended partly on the individual and partly on situational factors.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Words and deeds in the study of stealingJournal of Adolescence, 1980
- Two non‐reactive field experiments on stealing from a ‘lost’ letterBritish Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1979
- Experiments on Deviance with Special Reference to DishonestyPublished by Elsevier ,1979
- Victimization and the Fear of CrimeJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1979
- Is financial dishonesty a rational decision?British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1977
- The Effects of Temptation and Information about a Stranger on HelpingPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1977
- The Viability of the Lost Letter TechniqueThe Journal of Psychology, 1977
- Influence of a model's feeling about his behavior and his relevance as a comparison other on observers' helping behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968
- The Lost-Letter Technique: A Tool of Social ResearchPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1965