A comparison of mercury and digital clinical thermometers
- 1 September 1986
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Vol. 11 (5) , 535-543
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1986.tb01285.x
Abstract
A primarily clinical trial has been undertaken to investigate and compare the use of mercury and digital thermometers in a ward situation. Both laboratory and clinical studies show that there is no significant difference in the average accuracy of the two types of thermometers, however there is a greater fluctuation of readings of temperature when using electronic thermometers. In clinical studies between 9 and 23% of repeated measurements using an electronic thermometer differ by 0.5 degrees C or more whilst the corresponding range for mercury thermometers is 0.6%. It is also shown that when making clinical measurements with mercury thermometers there is no clinical advantage in using a measurement time longer than 3 minutes.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Salmonella cross-infection associated with contamination of rectal thermometersJournal of Hospital Infection, 1981
- Three-Minute Time Interval when Using an Oral Mercury-in-Glass Thermometer with or Without J-Temp SheathsNursing Research, 1980
- How Long Is That Thermometer Accurate?The American Journal of Nursing, 1978
- Temperature taking with glass thermometers: a reviewJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1976
- Hazards of mercury thermometersJAMA, 1973
- Spurious FeverThe American Journal of Nursing, 1972
- Correct Use of Electric ThermometersThe American Journal of Nursing, 1970
- How Accurate Are Clinical Thermometers?The American Journal of Nursing, 1969
- Temperature RegulationBMJ, 1966
- Changes in Oral TemperatureThe American Journal of Nursing, 1948