The moral hazards of neo-liberalism: lessons from the private insurance industry
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Economy and Society
- Vol. 29 (4) , 532-558
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140050174778
Abstract
The key tenets of neo-liberalism regarding risk, governance, and responsibility are critically evaluated through an empirical study of the private insurance industry. Recent tendencies in this industry towards increasing segmentation of consumers regarding risk, and towards an expansion of private policing of insurance fraud, are analysed. The definition of moral hazard is broadened to include all parties in the insurance relationship, not just the insured. Moral hazards embedded in the social organization of private insurance lead to various kinds of immoral risky behaviour by insureds, insurance companies, and their employees, and to intensified efforts to regulate this behaviour. The analysis concludes with some critical observations about the neo-liberal emphasis on minimal state, market fundamentalism, risk-taking, individual responsibility, and acceptance of inequality.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- 10 Can Welfare States Compete in a Global Economy?Published by University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) ,2000
- `Governmentality' and the Problem of Crime:Theoretical Criminology, 1997
- Moral Hazards, Welfare Dependency, and the Underclass: The Welfare State as an Enemy of SocietyPublished by Springer Nature ,1996
- Welfare State Disincentives with Endogenous Habits and NormsThe Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1995
- A multiple objective approach for constructing attribute-sampling plans for non-serial assembly itemsInternational Journal of Production Research, 1994
- Mosquito repellentsPublished by Biodiversity Heritage Library ,1992
- The Welfare Economics of Moral HazardPublished by Springer Nature ,1991
- A universe of chancePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1990
- State Constitutions in Historical PerspectiveThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1988