Validity of open-ended and payment scale approaches to eliciting willingness to pay
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Applied Economics
- Vol. 29 (1) , 79-84
- https://doi.org/10.1080/000368497327425
Abstract
The open-ended and payment scale approaches to eliciting willingness to pay (WTP) valuations are compared. Use of the payment scale led to a higher response rate, a higher rate of completion of the WTP question, higher mean and median WTP values, a stronger association between WTP and ability to pay and a higher R2 in regression analysis of WTP on several independent variables. Taking these results in combination, it can be inferred that the payment scale technique leads to more valid WTP values than use of the open-ended approach.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consistency Between Contingent Valuation Estimates: A Comparison of Two Studies of UK National ParksRegional Studies, 1994
- The Willingness to Pay for In Vitro Fertilization: A Pilot Study Using Contingent ValuationMedical Care, 1994
- How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental RegulationJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1994
- Willingness to pay for antihypertensive therapy — results of a Swedish pilot studyJournal of Health Economics, 1991
- Statistical Efficiency of Double‐Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent ValuationAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1991
- An econometric investigation of low birth weight in the United StatesJournal of Health Economics, 1991
- A Comparison of Direct and Indirect Methods for Estimating Environmental BenefitsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1986