Just-in-Time, Sub-Contracting and the Small Firm
- 1 September 1991
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Work, Employment & Society
- Vol. 5 (3) , 353-375
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017091005003003
Abstract
It has been suggested that moves towards Just In Time systems of production bring with them a fundamental change in the nature of the buyer-supplier relationship. New long-term, high-trust relationships are supposed to replace a win:win for the old win:lose equation. Equally, the new flexibility demanded of suppliers is supposed to favour the small firm. Elements of this analysis have been incorporated into variants of the post-Fordist paradigm. Based on research on high technology industries in Hertfordshire, this paper questions both assumptions. It is argued that small firms will be excluded from JIT style buyer-supplier relations. Furthermore, there is little evidence of a new form of cooperation emerging. Uneven and partial introduction of JIT systems is causing problems, the costs of which are being pushed onto suppliers by large firms.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- New Production Arrangements: The Totally Flexible Cage?Work, Employment & Society, 1989
- Flexible Integration, Scope Economies, and Strategic Alliances: Social and Spatial MediationsEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Space, 1988
- The Japanisation of British industry?Industrial Relations Journal, 1988
- The limits to‘Japanisation’—Just‐in‐Time, labour relations and the UK automotive industryNew Technology, Work and Employment, 1988
- The Japanisation of British industry? Instances from a high growth areaIndustrial Relations Journal, 1988
- The Japanese at work: illusions of the idealIndustrial Relations Journal, 1988
- From "Fordism" to "Toyotism"? The Social Organization of the Labor Process in the Japanese Automobile IndustryPolitics & Society, 1985