Determining priorities for purchasers: The public response to rationing within the NHS
- 1 August 1997
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Journal of Management in Medicine
- Vol. 11 (4) , 222-232
- https://doi.org/10.1108/02689239710177332
Abstract
There is currently great interest in how best to consult the public on purchasing priorities, but little information about the results of such activity. Based on health panels set up by Somerset Health Authority, intends to rectify this gap. The public were found to strongly favour universality of treatment, regardless of the cause of a condition, the age of the patient or the cost, although people should take some responsibility for their own health. There is a reluctance to purchase treatment for people who are not ill, although resources are well spent on health promotion and advice services. Argues that ordinary members of the public are capable of exploring complex funding priorities. A qualitative approach is essential to provide time for reflection, as the process of deliberation affects the decisions reached.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Managing Scarcity: Priority Setting and Rationing in the National Health ServiceJournal of Public Health Policy, 1997
- Rationing health careBMJ, 1996
- Rationing in the NHS: Principles and pragmatismThe Kings Fund.Rationing in the NHS: Principles and pragmatism£9.9571pp.1 85717 113 61857171136Nursing Management, 1996
- Health care rationing: the public's debateBMJ, 1996
- Innovation in Democratic Practice in Local GovernmentPolicy & Politics, 1996
- Consulting the public about health service prioritiesBMJ, 1995