People who influence women's decisions and preferred sources of information about prenatal testing for birth defects
- 3 June 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 44 (3) , 233-238
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828x.2004.00225.x
Abstract
Background: More than half of Victorian pregnant women are undergoing prenatal testing for birth defects, although little is known about the factors that are influencing their decisions.Aims: To examine whom women perceived as influencing their decision about prenatal testing for birth defects, with whom they would have liked to talk more, and what sources of information they preferred.Methods: A total of 737 pregnant women aged 37 years and over, who either had or had not undergone prenatal testing (screening and/or diagnosis) completed a questionnaire in 18 hospitals throughout Victoria.Results: Over 90% reported that they themselves had a strong influence on their decision, and 70% reported their partner as strongly influencing their decision. Approximately 30% of women who had both screening and diagnosis and more than 20% of women who had no prenatal testing, would like to have discussed prenatal testing with women who had previously had testing. Face‐to‐face counselling with a doctor or counsellor was the preferred source of information, followed by a pamphlet as the second choice.Conclusions: Given that both tested and untested women felt so strongly that they were responsible for their own decisions about prenatal testing, it is unlikely that universal acceptance and uptake will occur, even in this group of women of advanced maternal age. A support network of women who have already had testing could supplement existing sources of support. However, there continues to be a need for face‐to‐face sessions with a doctor or counsellor in combination with printed material.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Down syndrome screening: What do health professionals know?Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2003
- Womens' preference in Down syndrome screeningPrenatal Diagnosis, 2002
- Facilitating informed choice in prenatal testing: How well are we doing?American Journal of Medical Genetics, 2001
- A measure of informed choiceHealth Expectations, 2001
- Nuchal translucency and the acceptance of invasive prenatal chromosomal diagnosis in women aged 35 and olderObstetrics & Gynecology, 2001
- Characteristics of women who refuse an offer of prenatal diagnosis: Data from the California maternal serum alpha fetoprotein blood test experienceAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1998
- Written patient information about triple-marker screening: A randomized, controlled trialPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
- The effects of ethnicity, education and an informational video on pregnant women's knowledge and decisions about a prenatal diagnostic screening testPatient Education and Counseling, 1996
- Towards informed decisions about prenatal testing: A reviewPrenatal Diagnosis, 1995
- Anxiety, knowledge and satisfaction in women receiving false positive results on routine prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trialJournal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1993