Income, health, and the National Lottery
- 22 December 2001
- Vol. 323 (7327) , 1438-1439
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7327.1438
Abstract
Most people in the United Kingdom have taken part in one of the world's largest trials of one of the most important determinants of health. Unfortunately, neither the participants nor the organisers know about the trial and no one has collected follow up data. Each month, more than £150m is randomly redistributed among 60% of the adult population in the National Lottery.1 Over £16bn has been redistributed since the lottery began in 1994. Changing the redistribution of a small fraction of this money could create a randomised trial that reliably assessed the speed and extent to which increases in income improve health. The basic study design would be simple. Instead of lump sums, winners would receive regular, income-like payments (such as £40, £80, or £160 a month for a decade). Follow up of these winners, and a large random selection of non-winners, would assess effects on outcomes such as diet, smoking, admission to hospital and broader …Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Socio-economic factors and mortality among 25-64 year olds followed from 1991 to 1994: the New Zealand Census-Mortality Study.2002
- Evidence based policy: don't be timidBMJ, 2001
- The Campbell CollaborationBMJ, 2001
- Evidence based policy: proceed with care Commentary: research must be taken seriouslyBMJ, 2001
- How policy informs the evidenceBMJ, 2001
- Income inequality and mortality: importance to health of individual income, psychosocial environment, or material conditionsBMJ, 2000
- Randomised studies of income supplementation: a lost opportunity to assess health outcomesJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1999
- What Makes an Entrepreneur?Journal of Labor Economics, 1998
- Gambling with the nation's health?BMJ, 1995
- Sick Individuals and Sick PopulationsInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1985