Infections with Nonthoracotomy Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Can These Be Prevented?
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 21 (1) , 42-55
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01060.x
Abstract
Nonthoracotomy ICDs are believed to be the best therapeutic modality for treatment of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Little is known about the risk of infection with initial implantation of these devices. We studied the incidence, clinical characteristics, and risk factors associated with infections in 1,831 patients with nonthoracotomy ICD from the Endotak-C nonthoracotomy lead registry of Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. A transvenous lead was implanted in 950 patients (51.9%) and a combination transvenous plus subcutaneous patch was used in 881 patients (48.1%). Nine preselected data variables were studied, and all investigators identified as having patients with infections were personally contacted. Infections occurred in 22 (1.2%) of 1,831 patients receiving this nonthoracotomy ICD system. The mean time to infection was 5.7 +/- 6.5 months (range 1-25 months). Staphylococci were isolated in 58% of patients with reported infection. The presence of a subcutaneous defibrillator patch system was associated with the development of infection. Six of 950 patients (0.63%) with a totally transvenous lead system developed infection versus 16 of 838 (1.9%) patients with a transvenous lead plus subcutaneous patch system configuration (P = 0.015, Chi-square test), with an unadjusted estimated odds ratio of 3.06 (CI 1.19-7.86). The risk of infection encountered with the nonthoracotomy ICD is low, estimated from our data to be 1.2%. Placement of a subcutaneous defibrillator patch appears to be an independent risk factor for development of infection.Keywords
This publication has 69 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of implantation of nonthoracotomy defibrillators in the operating room versus the electrophysiology laboratoryThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
- Patient Survival Comparison in Three Generations of Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Review of 12 Years, 25,000 PatientsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1993
- Endocardial Lead Systems for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Uncertain Progress Beyond Base CampPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1992
- Clinical experience in seventy-seven patients with the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillatorAmerican Heart Journal, 1989
- Der automatische implantierbare Kardioverter-Defibrillator: Erste klinische ErfahrungenDeutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 1987
- Clinical experience, complications, and survival in 70 patients with the automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator.Circulation, 1985
- Clinical evaluation of the internal automatic cardioverter-defibrillator in survivors of sudden cardiac deathThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1983
- Clinical use of an implantable automatic tachycardia-terminating pacemakerAmerican Heart Journal, 1980
- The automatic implantable defibrillatorAmerican Heart Journal, 1980
- Termination of Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmias with an Implanted Automatic Defibrillator in Human BeingsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980