Knowledge about pandemic influenza and compliance with containment measures among Australians
- 1 August 2009
- journal article
- Published by WHO Press in Bulletin of the World Health Organization
- Vol. 87 (8) , 588-594
- https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.08.060772
Abstract
To examine the level of stated compliance with public health pandemic influenza control measures and explore factors influencing cooperation for pandemic influenza control in Australia. A computer-assisted telephone interview survey was conducted by professional interviewers to collect information on the Australian public’s knowledge of pandemic influenza and willingness to comply with public health control measures. The sample was randomly selected using an electronic database and printed telephone directories to ensure sample representativeness from all Australian states and territories. After we described pandemic influenza to the respondents to ensure they understood the significance of the issue, the questions on compliance were repeated and changes in responses were analysed with McNemar’s test for paired data. Only 23% of the 1166 respondents demonstrated a clear understanding of the term “pandemic influenza”. Of those interviewed, 94.1% reported being willing to comply with home quarantine; 94.2%, to avoid public events; and 90.7%, to postpone social gatherings. After we explained the meaning of “pandemic” to interviewees, stated compliance increased significantly (to 97.5%, 98.3% and 97.2% respectively). Those who reported being unfamiliar with the term “pandemic influenza,” male respondents and employed people not able to work from home were less willing to comply. In Australia, should the threat arise, compliance with containment measures against pandemic influenza is likely to be high, yet it could be further enhanced through a public education programme conveying just a few key messages. A basic understanding of pandemic influenza is associated with stated willingness to comply with containment measures. Investing now in promoting measures to prepare for a pandemic or other health emergency will have considerable value.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Communicating With the Public About Emerging Health Threats: Lessons From the Pre-Event Message Development ProjectAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2008
- Pandemic planning: Non‐pharmaceutical interventionsRespirology, 2008
- Modeling targeted layered containment of an influenza pandemic in the United StatesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses: systematic reviewBMJ, 2007
- Nonpharmaceutical Interventions Implemented by US Cities During the 1918-1919 Influenza PandemicJAMA, 2007
- The effect of public health measures on the 1918 influenza pandemic in U.S. citiesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Public health interventions and epidemic intensity during the 1918 influenza pandemicProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Avian Influenza Risk Perception, Europe and AsiaEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2007
- A population survey--would Australian general practice be the first point of contact during an anthrax bioterrorism event?2006
- Monitoring community responses to the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong: from day 10 to day 62Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2003