Systematic review of randomized clinical trials on the use of hydroxyethyl starch for fluid management in sepsis
Open Access
- 24 January 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 8 (1) , 1
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-227x-8-1
Abstract
Patients with sepsis typically require large resuscitation volumes, but the optimal type of fluid remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate current evidence on the effectiveness and safety of hydroxyethyl starch for fluid management in sepsis. Computer searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were performed using search terms that included hydroxyethyl starch; hetastarch; shock, septic; sepsis; randomized controlled trials; and random allocation. Additional methods were examination of reference lists and hand searching. Randomized clinical trials comparing hydroxyethyl starch with other fluids in patients with sepsis were selected. Data were extracted on numbers of patients randomized, specific indication, fluid regimen, follow-up, endpoints, hydroxyethyl starch volume infused and duration of administration, and major study findings. Twelve randomized trials involving a total of 1062 patients were included. Ten trials (83%) were acute studies with observation periods of 5 days or less, most frequently assessing cardiorespiratory and hemodynamic variables. Two trials were designed as outcome studies with follow-up for 34 and 90 days, respectively. Hydroxyethyl starch increased the incidence of acute renal failure compared both with gelatin (odds ratio, 2.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.13–5.83) and crystalloid (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.22–2.71). In the largest and most recent trial a trend was observed toward increased overall mortality among hydroxyethyl starch recipients (odds ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.94–1.95), and mortality was higher (p < 0.001) in patients receiving > 22 mL·kg-1 hydroxyethyl starch per day than lower doses. Hydroxyethyl starch increases the risk of acute renal failure among patients with sepsis and may also reduce the probability of survival. While the evidence reviewed cannot necessarily be applied to other clinical indications, hydroxyethyl starch should be avoided in sepsis.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hydroxyethyl starch – can the safety problems be ignored?Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2004
- Long-term mortality and medical care charges in patients with severe sepsisCritical Care Medicine, 2003
- Effects of Fluid Resuscitation on Mesenteric Microvascular Blood Flow and Lymphatic Activity After Severe Hemorrhagic Shock in RatsShock, 2003
- Effects of hydroxyethylstarch and gelatin on renal function in severe sepsis: a multicentre randomised studyThe Lancet, 2001
- Hypoproteinemia predicts acute respiratory distress syndrome development, weight gain, and death in patients with sepsisCritical Care Medicine, 2000
- Effect of hydroxyethylstarch in brain-dead kidney donors on renal function in kidney-transplant recipientsThe Lancet, 1996
- RETRACTED ARTICLE: Influence of different volume therapies on platelet function in the critically illIntensive Care Medicine, 1996
- Effects of Hetastarch and Albumin on Coagulation in Patients with Septic ShockThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1988
- Accumulation of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) in the liver of patients with renal failure and portal hypertensionJournal of Hepatology, 1986
- Ascites als Komplikation hepatischer Speicherung von Hydroxyethylstärke (HES) bei LangzeitdialyseJournal of Molecular Medicine, 1984